MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417201229 · doi:10.62762/seco.2025.864874

Stochastic Optimal Energy Planning of the Multi-connected Grids by the Presence of Bi-facial PV Panels: Interaction of Micro-nano and Main Grid

2025· article· W4417201229 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable Energy Control and Optimization · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemMicrogridGridGreenhouse gasLinear programmingConstraint (computer-aided design)Solar energyEnergy (signal processing)Renewable energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from fossil fuel-based energy systems have accelerated the global push toward cleaner technologies. Bi-facial photovoltaic (BPV) panels, capable of capturing solar irradiance from both sides, have emerged as a promising solution due to their higher energy yield and comparable costs to traditional PV systems. This paper explores the integration of BPV panels into a multi-connected grid comprising nano-, micro-, and main grid layers. A stochastic optimization framework is developed to address the uncertainties of solar irradiance. The problem is formulated as a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model and solved using the Augmented Epsilon Constraint (AEC) method in the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) environment. Results demonstrate that incorporating BPV panels reduces microgrid operational costs by approximately 20%, boosts nano-grid profits by about 81%, and cuts emissions by about 10%, highlighting their potential to enhance system efficiency, flexibility, and sustainability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it