MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B037: Early-Onset Cancer: A Focus on Pregnancy-Associated Cases

2025· article· en· W4417201254 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicole C. Loroña, Jenny Harris, Jane C. Figueiredo

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Risks and Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancyCancerIncidence (geometry)Breast cancerThyroid cancerYoung adultEctopic pregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Recent data in the U.S. show a rising rate of early-onset cancers (diagnosed before age 50) over the past decade, with the largest increase in rates seen in the 30-39 age group and the highest number of cases in the 40-49 age group. Simultaneously, the maternal age at the time of pregnancy has increased, with 38% of first births now occurring in women aged 30 and older. The increasing incidence of early-onset cancer, coupled with increasing maternal age, could result in more cancers diagnosed during pregnancy or postpartum. The present study describes trends in the incidence of cancer during pregnancy and postpartum and identifies predictors of pregnancy-associated cancers. Methods: We identified cancer cases diagnosed in adults from 2015 to 2023 with at least one health encounter in the time frame in a large health system in the greater Los Angeles area. We identified patients with obstetric International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes and/or oncology notes mentioning pregnancy in the two years before and six months following the patient’s date of cancer diagnosis. Pregnancy-associated cancer was defined as a diagnosis during pregnancy or within two years postpartum (following any birth, miscarriage, or ectopic pregnancy). Descriptive statistics characterized demographic and cancer-related factors. Results: Among 40,432 patients with cancer during the study period, we identified 217 pregnancy-associated cancers in 216 patients [one individual had thyroid cancer diagnosed following a pregnancy, and breast cancer in a subsequent pregnancy]. Median age at cancer diagnosis was 37 (range: 24-50). 13% of patients were Asian, 6% were Black or African American,15% were Hispanic, and 56% were non-Hispanic White. The majority (n=193, 92%) of pregnancy-associated cancers were solid tumors (vs. 8% hematological), of which the most common sites were breast (N=85, 44%), thyroid (N=35, 18%), cervix (N=13, 7%), central nervous system (N=11, 6%), ovarian (N=8, 4%) and colon (N=6, 3%). Most solid tumors were diagnosed at early stages (50% stage I, 21% stage II vs. 11% stage III, 9% stage IV), with 15 in situ cancers diagnosed (6 breast cancer, 6 gynecologic malignancies, and 3 melanoma). 60 cancers were diagnosed during pregnancy (33% breast and 13% thyroid cancer), 91 during one year postpartum (32% breast and 20% thyroid cancer), and 66 between one and two years postpartum (55% breast and 14% thyroid cancer). Analyses of the total incidence of and predictors of pregnancy-associated cancer are ongoing. Conclusions: Pregnancy-related cancers present challenges for maternal-fetal care and oncology. The two-year interval postpartum may represent a key window for surveillance and earlier diagnosis. Identifying predictors, treatment patterns, and risk factors for adverse outcomes will help develop screening strategies to diagnose pregnancy-related cancer early and improve clinical management of these cases. Citation Format: Nicole C. Loroña, Jenny Harris, Jane C. Figueiredo. Early-Onset Cancer: A Focus on Pregnancy-Associated Cases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: The Rise in Early-Onset Cancers—Knowledge Gaps and Research Opportunities; 2025 Dec 10-13; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(23_Suppl):Abstract nr B037.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.309
GPT teacher head0.582
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicCancer Risks and FactorsFrench-language works237,207