MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract PR008: Incidence of early onset colorectal, kidney, uterine and pancreatic cancer by county-level obesity prevalence in the U.S., 2010-2022

2025· article· en· W4417201256 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Meredith S. Shiels, Anika T. Haque, Ruth M. Pfeiffer, Constanza Camargo, Megan A. Clarke, Brittny Davis Lynn, Eric A. Engels, Neal D. Freedman, Gretchen L. Gierach, Jonathan N. Hofmann, Rena R. Jones, Erikka Loftfield, Rashmi Sinha, Lindsay M. Morton, Stephen J. Chanock

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Risks and Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObesityPancreatic cancerKidney cancerIncidence (geometry)CancerCancer registryDiabetes mellitusConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Obesity has been implicated as a potential driving factor in rising rates of several cancers in early onset age groups, including cancers of the colorectum, kidney, uterus and pancreas. We assessed whether obesity prevalence in U.S. counties was associated with rates and trends in rates of these cancers over time in 20-49-year-olds. Methods: We used cancer incidence data from 21 cancer registries in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program during 2010-2022. SEER-21 data were merged with data on the 2015 county-level prevalence of obesity from the CDC Diabetes Interactive Atlas, categorized into quintiles. Average annual percentage changes (AAPCs) in age-standardized rates (ASRs) during 2010-2022 were estimated with Joinpoint regression and tested for equality across quintiles of county-level obesity among 20-49-year-olds. In addition, rate ratios of recent ASRs of cancers of the colorectum, kidney, uterus, and pancreas were compared across quintiles of county-level obesity during 2018-2022. Results: During 2010-2022, ASRs of each obesity-related cancer increased significantly among 20-49-year-olds: colorectum (AAPC=2.47%; 95% confidence interval CI 2.12, 2.89), kidney (1.69%; 95%CI 1.02, 2.77), uterus (1.94%; 95%CI 1.50, 2.63), and pancreas (2.02%; 95%CI 1.74, 2.43). There were significant increases in AAPCs during 2010-2022 for each of these cancers in each quintile of county-level obesity, with the exception of kidney cancer rates in counties with the lowest obesity prevalence. There were no significant differences in the magnitudes of the AAPCs across county-level quintiles obesity for colorectal cancer (p=0.30). While AAPCs differed significantly across quintiles for kidney (p=0.05), uterine (p=0.03) and pancreatic cancers (p=0.01), AAPCs were greatest in the highest quintile of county-level obesity only for kidney cancer. However, during 2018-2022, ASRs in the highest quintile of county-level obesity were significantly higher than in the lowest quintile of county-level obesity for colorectal cancer (rate ratio [RR]=1.21; 95%CI 1.17-.25), pancreatic cancer (RR=1.25; 95%CI 1.15-1.35), uterine cancer (RR=1.08; 95%CI 1.03-1.13) and kidney cancer (RR=1.73; 95%CI 1.65-1.80). Conclusions: Higher county-level obesity prevalence in the U.S. was associated with higher ASRs of colorectal, kidney, uterine and pancreatic cancers in early onset age groups. Age-standardized incidence rates of these cancers increased during 2010-2022, regardless of county-level obesity. Future work should examine histologic subtypes and assess whether increases over time in county-level obesity prevalence is associated with a more rapid increase in colorectal, kidney, uterine and pancreatic cancer rates. Citation Format: Meredith Shiels, Anika Haque, Ruth Pfeiffer, Constanza Camargo, Megan Clarke, Brittny Davis Lynn, Eric Engels, Neal Freedman, Gretchen Gierach, Jonathan Hofmann, Rena Jones, Erikka Loftfield, Rashmi Sinha, Lindsay Morton, Stephen Chanock. Incidence of early onset colorectal, kidney, uterine and pancreatic cancer by county-level obesity prevalence in the U.S., 2010-2022 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: The Rise in Early-Onset Cancers—Knowledge Gaps and Research Opportunities; 2025 Dec 10-13; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(23_Suppl):Abstract nr PR008.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.507
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicCancer Risks and FactorsFrench-language works237,207