MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract C010: Association of a germline KDM3C polymorphism with early cancer diagnosis

2025· article· en· W4417201523 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Z. Kiss, Adria Hasan, R. Shastry, Elena V. Demidova, Philip Czyzewicz, Yan Zhou, Johnathan R. Whetstine, Joshua E. Meyer, Sanjeevani Arora

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismSNPLoss of heterozygosityCohortCancerBiobankProspective cohort studyGermlineUniparental disomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The rise in early-onset cancers remains an urgent challenge, with multiple genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors likely contributing. We have identified a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in KDM3C/JMJD1C, a histone demethylase required for DNA damage repair, that correlates with chemoradiotherapy response and is associated with defective double-strand break repair across multiple cellular models. We hypothesized that carriers of this SNP develop genomic instability earlier in life, predisposing them to younger ages at cancer diagnosis. Methods: As the SNP is common in the population, we analyzed data from the United Kingdom Biobank (UKB), a prospective cohort of 501,946 participants (ages 40–69 at recruitment, 2006–2010; 30-year follow-up planned). Descriptive statistics (median, proportion) were used to describe baseline characteristics of the exposed and unexposed groups in the UKB. Cancer sub-cohorts were derived from the UKB Cancer Register, clustered by ICD10 code, and stratified by age <45 vs ≥45 years. Associations between SNP (absent, heterozygous, and homozygous) status and cancer diagnosis were evaluated using contingency tables, risk ratios (RR), and chi-square tests (α=0.05). Results: The UK Biobank cohort included 501,946 participants (median age 58; 54% female), of whom 10% were <45 years of age at recruitment. The homozygous SNP was present in 56% of the overall cohort. Homozygosity for SNP varied by genetic ancestry (58% White, 11% Black, 12% Chinese populations). The cancer register cohort included 117,409 patients (median diagnosis age 63.7; 7% <45 years). Compared with the absence of SNP, heterozygosity was not associated with increased risk of cancer overall (p=0.95). Compared with the absence of SNP, homozygosity was associated with increased risk of cancer overall (RR=1.02; p=0.0065) and in those <45 years (RR=1.07; p=0.029), but not ≥45 years (p=0.16). Among cancer sub-cohorts, homozygosity was associated with increased risk of skin cancer at all ages (RR=1.14; p<0.05) and was not associated with cervical carcinoma in situ (p=0.63). In patients age <45, the association with skin cancer strengthened (RR=1.22; p=0.02), and homozygosity became significantly associated with cervical carcinoma in situ (RR=1.28; p=0.03). Conclusion: These findings suggest that the KDM3C SNP may predispose to early-onset cancers, particularly skin and cervical cancers. Given the rising incidence of early-onset cancers, integrating KDM3C SNP status into risk stratification may enhance early detection and prevention strategies, though validation in independent cohorts will be essential. Citation Format: Zachary AC. Kiss, Adria Hasan, Raksha Shastry, Elena V. Demidova, Philip Czyzewicz, Yan Zhou, Johnathan Whetstine, Joshua E. Meyer, Sanjeevani Arora. Association of a germline KDM3C polymorphism with early cancer diagnosis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: The Rise in Early-Onset Cancers—Knowledge Gaps and Research Opportunities; 2025 Dec 10-13; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(23_Suppl):Abstract nr C010.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.407 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→