MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417201768 · doi:10.1109/tce.2025.3642548

Koopman-Based Data-Driven Control of Networked Nonlinear System Under an Event-Triggered Communication

2025· article· W4417201768 on OpenAlexaff
Wang Xian-ming, Mouquan Shen, Liwei Li, Xudong Zhao, Qing-Guo Wang, Zheng Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemInverted pendulumBounded functionControl systemMatrix (chemical analysis)Operator (biology)Networked control system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on Koopman-based data-driven control of networked nonlinear system under an event-triggered communication. System dynamic is lifted by the Koopman operator with a finite number observation function. A triggering rule integrating a data matrix is provided to improve triggering sensitivity. A data-based parameterization method is utilized to obtain control gain and triggering threshold with the help of linear matrix inequalities. Sufficient conditions are supplied to ensure that the closed-loop system remains uniformly ultimately bounded and meets the specifiedH∞performance. An inverted pendulum is provided to verify the effectiveness of the presented strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Consumer ElectronicsSame topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207