MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract C021: Characterizing the clinicopathological, genomic and spatial transcriptomic features of colibactin-induced colorectal cancers

2025· article· en· W4417208722 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Georgeson, Jihoon E. Joo, Alysha Prisc, Lochlan Fennell, Liam Skinner, Bernard J. Pope, Khalid Mahmood, Romy Walker, Mark Clendenning, Julia Como, Natalie Diepenhorst, Julie McDonald, Finlay Macrae, Christophe Rosty, Ingrid Winship, Amanda I. Phipps, Mark A. Jenkins, Daniel D. Buchanan

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoss of heterozygosityTranscriptomeColorectal cancerContext (archaeology)GenomicsExonAdenocarcinomaGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Colorectal cancers (CRCs)with related colibactin-induced DNA damage from pks+E.coli bacteria are identified by the presence of the SBS88 tumor mutational signature and mutations in unique 5bp genomic contexts (extended contexts). CRCs with high SBS88 and high extended contexts (colibactin-positive) remain poorly characterized in terms of identifying distinct clinicopathological, genomic, and transcriptomic features. Methods: We applied a mutational signature-based classifier derived from organoid sequencing data to identify colibactin-positive CRCs in 1,716 non-hereditary, microsatellite stable (MSS) whole-genome sequenced primary tumors from Genomics England (GEL). Clinicopathological, genomic and survival associations were tested in an independent cohort of 4,254 primary MSS CRCs from the GECCO-CCFR consortium. Spatial transcriptomic profiling of the tumor microenvironment of colibactin-positive EOCRCs was performed using Nanostring CosMx technology. Results: Colibactin-positive CRCs were identified in 10.2% (175/1,716) of the GEL CRCs and were associated with an early age at diagnosis (<40 years: 4.0% of positives v 2.0% of negatives; p=0.1), enrichment in patients born on or after 1980 (6.9% v 1.4%; p=0.02), and location in distal colon and rectum compared with proximal colon (45%/47% v 41%/28% distal/rectum; p=5x10-11) when compared with the colibactin-negative CRCs (n=1,400, 81%). Genomic analysis revealed recurrent mutations in established CRC driver genes, the strongest of which were APC:c.835-8A>G (p=1x10-12), SMAD4:c.788-8A>G (p=0.0001) and BRAF:c.1781A>G (p=0.001), with mutations exhibiting site-specificity. Colibactin-positive CRCs exhibited distinctive large-scale genomic alterations, including recurrent loss of heterozygosity spanning TGIF1, SMAD2, DCC, and SMAD4 gene region. Mutation timing analysis revealed that SBS88-associated mutations, extended context mutations and APC:c.835-8A>G are early, clonal events (p=3x10-35, 7x10-81, 3x10-9 respectively). In the GECCO-CCFR CRCs, 5.1% of 4,254 MSS CRCs were identified as colibactin-positive (216 of 4,254) with similar significant genomic hallmarks: earlier age at diagnosis (<50 years p=0.03), distal and rectum site (p=4x10-9), and recurrent mutations in APC, SMAD4 and BRAF (p=4x10-128, 2x10-9, 2x10-8). Spatial transcriptomic profiling of six EOCRCs (three colibactin-positive) obtained 1.5 million cells across 19 cell types. Our preliminary analyses identified distinct stromal and immunological profiles associated with colibactin-positive EOCRCs. Conclusions: A combined SBS88 and extended context mutational signature-based classifier for colibactin-induced DNA damage, identified a distinct subtype of CRC characterized by earlier age at diagnosis, distal and rectal site predominance, specific somatic mutations, and unique genomic instability patterns. These findings provide new insights into colibactin-mediated carcinogenesis and creates opportunities for developing both targeted treatment and prevention strategies for colibactin-associated CRC. Citation Format: Peter Georgeson, Jihoon E. Joo, Alysha Prisc, Lochlan Fennell, Liam Skinner, Bernard J. Pope, Khalid Mahmood, Romy Walker, Mark Clendenning, Julia Como, Natalie Diepenhorst, Julie McDonald, Finlay A. Macrae, Christophe Rosty, Ingrid M. Winship, Amanda Phipps, Mark A. Jenkins, Ulrike Peters, Daniel D. Buchanan. Characterizing the clinicopathological, genomic and spatial transcriptomic features of colibactin-induced colorectal cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: The Rise in Early-Onset Cancers—Knowledge Gaps and Research Opportunities; 2025 Dec 10-13; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(23_Suppl):Abstract nr C021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→