Higher Dimensionality in the Mg–Co–B System: Synthesis and Structure of Incommensurate Composite Mg <sub>1+ε</sub> Co <sub>4</sub> B <sub>4</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Guided by high-temperature in situ X-ray diffraction, the discovery and synthesis of Mg 1+ε Co 4 B 4 (ε ≈ 0.272) using a MgH 2 hydride precursor is reported, along with a detailed crystal structure description and measurement of magnetic properties. The mismatch in lattice periodicities between Mg and Co–B substructures places Mg 1+ε Co 4 B 4 in the family of incommensurate composite crystals and prompted structural refinement in a (3 + 1)-dimensional model. The structure of Mg 1+ε Co 4 B 4 ( P 4 2 / ncm (00γ) s 00 s, a = 6.75847(7) Å, c = 3.94007(8) Å, q = (0, 0, 1.2721(3))) was refined from neutron powder diffraction and high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction data and confirmed by scanning transmission electron microscopy and electron diffraction. Mg 1+ε Co 4 B 4 is isostructural to Nd 1+ε Fe 4 B 4 and several related ternary borides with 0.07 ≤ ε ≤ 0.17, with Mg occupying the rare-earth site. Satellite reflections in the electron diffraction patterns hinted at positional modulation of the transition metal–boron substructure by Mg atoms, but this could not be refined from the neutron or X-ray diffraction data. Low-temperature magnetic measurements show no indications of long-range magnetic ordering or superconductivity down to 5 K. DFT calculations confirmed the absence of a magnetically ordered ground state and the stability of a 5:4 supercell (ε = 0.25) relative to the fully commensurate structure. Neutron diffraction and synthesis from elemental Mg demonstrated that Mg 1+ε Co 4 B 4 is not a hydrogen-stabilized phase. Mg 1+ε Co 4 B 4 represents the second compound reported in the Mg–Co–B system and the first superspace symmetry model of a Nd 1+ε Fe 4 B 4 -type incommensurate composite compound refined from powder diffraction data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".