Global Andrology Forum Clinical Guidelines on Antioxidant Use in the Treatment of Male Infertility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Antioxidant (AOX) therapy has long been investigated for the management of male infertility. It has potential benefits, but persistent controversy affects its broad acceptance and clinical utility. This study aimed to develop standardized, evidence-based guidelines for AOX use by synthesizing the best available evidence and achieving global expert consensus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted by senior experts of the Global Andrology Forum (GAF). Additionally, data on the real-life use of oxidative stress (OS) testing and AOX use obtained from the largest global survey of practicing physicians conducted by GAF, which served as a reference point for this study. In phase one, 151 international specialists (>5 years' experience) participated in a modified Delphi process to evaluate AOX therapy in male infertility. Experts reviewed draft statements and rated agreement on a 10-point Likert scale. Statements achieving >80% consensus (with score >7/10) were accepted. The original eight statements were expanded to 19 and finalized into 18. In phase two, 84 senior physicians (>10 years' experience) graded the Delphi-approved statements using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Four out of the 18 statements failed to reach consensus and were excluded. Of the final 14 statements, seven (50%) were graded as "Strong" and seven (50%) as "Weak." Current evidence indicates that AOX therapy can reduce OS, improve sperm quality, and potentially enhance reproductive outcomes. However, benefits vary by agent, regimen, and patient population. The guidelines emphasize the need to document OS and to consider underlying factors before initiating AOX therapy, and caution against indiscriminate or prolonged use. CONCLUSIONS: Developed through a dual-validation process and endorsed by a globally diverse expert panel, these GAF guidelines represent the first standardized, evidence-based guidelines for AOX use in male infertility. By addressing heterogeneity in research and practice, they provide clinicians with practical, safe, and patient-centered recommendations for rational AOX therapy worldwide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.029 | 0.044 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".