MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417221374 · doi:10.5267/j.esm.2025.11.002

Hybrid computational approach for nonlinear bending of bio-inspired helicoid composite plates using MITC3i and ANN

2025· article· W4417221374 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huu Dang, Quoc Hoa Pham

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Solid Mechanics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemVirtual workBoundary value problemFinite element methodStiffnessDeflection (physics)Artificial neural networkFlexural rigidityFree energy principle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the nonlinear static response of bio-inspired helicoidal laminated composite (BiHLC) plates supported by a Pasternak medium. A combined analytical framework is established by integrating the mixed interpolation of tensorial components (MITC3i) approach with the first order shear deformation plate theory (FSDT). The Pasternak foundation is characterized by its spring stiffness k1 and shear stiffness k2. Based on the Lagrangian energy principle and von Kármán nonlinear theory, the governing equations are formulated and numerically solved through the Newton–Raphson iterative procedure. The effectiveness of the novel method is verified through comparisons with published documents. Additionally, the effects of helicoidal stacking sequences, geometric configurations, boundary constraints, and foundation rigidity on the large deflection behavior are analyzed. An artificial neural network (ANN) model is also proposed to estimate displacements efficiently, eliminating the dependence on finite element computations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering Solid MechanicsSame topicComposite Structure Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207