MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417230366 · doi:10.1088/1361-665x/ae21ae

An experimental study of specimen size and type effects on cyclic behavior of superelastic NiTi

2025· article· W4417230366 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSmart Materials and Structures · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMaterials Science
TopicShape Memory Alloy Transformations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSMA*Shape-memory alloyNickel titaniumHysteresisModulusVibrationPseudoelasticity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The remarkable ability of shape memory alloys (SMAs) to dissipate energy during cyclic loading, combined with their outstanding superelasticity, make them a highly suitable material for passive vibration control systems. Both experimental observations and theoretical insights in previous studies showed that the mechanical behavior of SMA could be influenced by the size and type of specimens. Despite its importance, studies dedicated to evaluating the effect of specimen size and type on the cyclic behavior of SMA are scarce. This paper addresses the gap by experimentally evaluating the mechanical behavior of SMA specimens of different sizes and types under various cyclic loading conditions. The specimens include single-strand wires with a 0.5 mm and 1.2 mm diameter, and a 1.2 mm diameter multi-strand rope. The evolution of the hysteresis loop, energy dissipation, residual strain, and effective modulus of these specimens are investigated systematically. The results indicate that as loading frequency gradually increases, the cyclic behavior of different size SMA wires consistently exhibit four distinct patterns. The frequency thresholds that distinguish these patterns decrease as wire diameter increases. The mechanical behavior of a SMA rope appears to be influenced by both the size of the constituent strand and the overall diameter of the rope. It was found that while the behavior of a rope closely resembles that of a single-strand wire of the same component size in the low frequency range, as loading frequency increases, it quickly transitions to a behavior more similar to that of a single-strand wire having the same diameter as the rope.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it