MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417230970 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2025.10494

Access to MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor in Ontario: Geographic and Socioeconomic Referral Patterns

2025· article· en· W4417230970 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Inthuja Suthananthan, Nadia Scantlebury, Audrey Boudah, Camryn R. Rohringer, Michael L. Schwartz, Nir Lipsman, Agessandro Abrahão

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEssential tremorThalamotomyReferralOutreachFocused ultrasoundSocioeconomic statusSteering committee

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy has expanded the surgical treatment envelope for patients with essential tremor who fail on first-line pharmacological therapies. Understanding differences in access to MRgFUS thalamotomy, a procedure publicly funded in Ontario, is a first step to ensuring equitable opportunity for treatment across the province. In this brief communication, we explore the frequency of referrals directed to our tremor program between 2018 and 2023. We highlight differences in referral rates by jurisdiction and medical specialty, and explore associations with socio-economic factors. Our findings inform public policy and identify geographical areas for targeted outreach to enhance equitable access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicNeurological disorders and treatments→French-language works237,207→