MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417232989 · doi:10.5216/rfd.v49i2.80987

OS DIREITOS INDÍGENAS NAS CONSTITUIÇÕES ESTADUAIS DA AMAZÔNIA LEGAL BRASILEIRA

2025· article· W4417232989 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Assis da Costa Oliveira, Vinícius Machado

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Health and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEgg Farmers of Canada
KeywordsCitizenshipHuman rightsField (mathematics)State (computer science)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No presente artigo objetivamos analisar os direitos indígenas normatizados em constituições políticas de 11 estados brasileiros, que compõe a chamada Amazônia Legal, para compreender a sintonia que possuem ou não com o texto dos direitos indígenas presente na Constituição Federal de 1988, e no que avançam em relação à tal documento. Com base na pesquisa documental e no estudo do direito comparado, procuramos evidenciar um conteúdo pouco conhecido e utilizado no campo jurídico para aprofundar o entendimento dos desafios e das possibilidades de internalização da cidadania diferenciada no Estado brasileiro.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista da Faculdade de Direito da UFGSame topicIndigenous Health and EducationFrench-language works237,207