MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417236685 · doi:10.1093/botlinnean/boaf092

Island hopping: dispersal of <i>Pitcairnia</i> L’Her. (Bromeliaceae) through the Caribbean islands

2025· article· en· W4417236685 on OpenAlexaff
Natalia Ruiz-Vargas, Dimitris A. Herrera, Roberta J. Mason‐Gamer

Bibliographic record

VenueBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiological dispersalGenusBiogeographyCladeMonophylyCaribbean islandMesophyte

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pitcairnia, a group of terrestrial and mesophytic plants, is the second largest genus in the Bromeliaceae family, with over 400 species distributed in the Neotropics. There are 13 species described for the Caribbean islands, all endemic to the region and mostly single-island endemics. We used Target Sequence Capture with the Bromeliad1776 baits kit to infer phylogenomic relationships between these species and estimated divergence times. We conducted broad sampling throughout the genus with emphasis in northern South America and Central America to determine the monophyly of the Caribbean species and their biogeographic history. Our analysis indicates that the Caribbean species form a clade with their closest relatives in Venezuela, suggesting a single dispersal event to the islands. Migration into the Caribbean likely occurred from northern South America through the Lesser Antilles Island Arc around 200 000 years ago, and dispersal into the rest of the islands following a unidirectional westwards trajectory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanical Journal of the Linnean SocietySame topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207