MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417236974 · doi:10.1063/5.0299198

Shear-wave multi-frequency pulse for single-shot viscoelastic sensing

2025· article· en· W4417236974 on OpenAlexafffund
Shane Steinberg, Yuu Ono, Sreeraman Rajan

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsViscoelasticityElasticity (physics)Dispersion (optics)TransducerViscosityShear wavesPulse (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-resolved estimation of viscoelastic properties is essential for capturing dynamic mechanical changes in soft materials and biological tissues. Viscoelastic parameters can be estimated from shear-wave velocity (SWV) dispersion, but repeated excitations at different frequencies limit temporal resolution. We introduce a method of SWV dispersion measurement using a shear-wave multi-frequency pulse (SW-MFP) that encodes several chosen frequencies into a single excitation. Shear elasticity and viscosity estimates are obtained by fitting the measured SWV dispersion to the Kelvin–Voigt model. Experiments were performed using a compact setup with dual plane wave ultrasound transducers and a miniaturized SW actuator. Tissue-mimicking phantoms with varied viscoelastic properties were distinguished by their SWV dispersion curves and corresponding viscoelastic parameter estimates. These results demonstrate SW-MFP for single-shot viscoelastic sensing, providing a pathway toward real-time viscoelastic characterization of dynamic soft materials in biomedical and industrial applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207