MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417239825 · doi:10.1093/bjs/znaf267.008

First pan-endocrine meta-analysis identifies MIR-221 as a cross-tumour transcriptomic biomarker: a machine learning framework for precision surgical oncology

2025· article· en· W4417239825 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joshua Agilinko, Jerrin Bawa, Mufaddal Moonim, Neil Tolley, Fausto Palazzo, Aimee N. Di Marco

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish journal of surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLogistic regressionBiomarkerSupport vector machinePrecision medicinePapillary thyroid cancerClassifier (UML)Bayesian probabilityThyroid cancerCancer biomarkers

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Surgical decision-making in endocrine malignancies is often confounded by heterogeneous biology, multifocality and unpredictable recurrence. In this context, microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as non-invasive biomarkers with translational potential. Their integration could refine diagnostic and prognostic pathways across thyroid, adrenal, parathyroid and neuroendocrine tumours. Although tumour-specific miRNA signatures have been reported, no unifying biomarker has been validated across endocrine cancers. This study presents the first transcriptomic, machine learning-integrated meta-analysis with in-silico pathway mapping to identify dominant miRNA classifiers, building on prior findings in a 30-patient indeterminate thyroid nodule cohort. Method A systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 studies (n = 3412) was performed. Pooled diagnostic metrics (Area Under Curve [AUC], sensitivity) and prognostic estimates (hazard ratios) were derived using DerSimonian–Laird and Bayesian hierarchical models. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) assessed feature attribution. Logistic regression evaluated additive effects. Validated targets were mapped to canonical pathways using support vector machine (SVM)-ranked miRDB, miRWalk and TarBase databases. Risk of bias was evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa. Results miR-221 emerged as the highest-ranking biomarker (AUC 0.841;HR 10.10;P < 0.001), improving multi-miRNA classifiers by +0.07 AUC. SHAP and LIME confirmed dominance over miR-146b (AUC 0.60) and miR-375 (AUC 0.66). In thyroid cancer alone, miR-221 achieved 88% sensitivity, outperforming cytology (60–75%) and ultrasound (52–85%). Logistic regression validated it as the top individual classifier (AUC 0.77). Validated targets were enriched in MAPK and PI3K–Akt. Conclusion We propose miR-221 as the first cross-endocrine molecular marker with both diagnostic and prognostic value. A translational pipeline is planned, including prospective validation in a 30-patient indeterminate thyroid cohort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.490
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish journal of surgerySame topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207