Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter deals with the question of the military nature of the Curonian settlement in the Memel area (today Klaipėda ). It begins by examining the indications of the presence of the Curonian population in the southern part of Curonia in the second half of the 13th century, after the construction of the Teutonic Order&s;s Memel castle (1252–1253). Using a comparative method and taking into account the results of the research on the Scalovians/Schalvians in the area of Ragnit (today Neman), the question of the military character of the Curonian settlement at the Memel castle after 1328 is then addressed. Source evidence indicating the fulfilment of various military functions by the Curonians here in relation to the Teutonic Order, especially the commandery of Memel, is presented in detail. As a result, this chapter argues that despite the relatively small number of Curonians in Memel, the military services they provided were of considerable significance to the so-called ‘Lithuanian War’ waged by the Teutonic Order from the last quarter of the 13th century to the first quarter of the 15th century, due to the great importance of Memel castle for the Order.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".