MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417246961 · doi:10.5206/mase/22989

A study on statistical properties of a new class of $q$-Fréchet distribution

2025· article· en· W4417246961 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hania Douini, Ibrahim Sadok

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics in Applied Sciences and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneralizationReliability (semiconductor)Focus (optics)Statistical modelMoment (physics)Flexibility (engineering)Bayesian probabilityMaximum likelihoodEstimation theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces the $ q $-Fréchet distribution, a two-parameter generalization of the classical Fréchet model that incorporates a pathway parameter $ q $ within the framework of Tsallis statistics. The proposed distribution offers enhanced flexibility for modeling real-world data with non-standard tail behavior, accommodating both sub-exponential ($ q<1 $) and super-exponential ($ 1<q<2 $) regimes. We derive its fundamental statistical properties, including survival, hazard, quantile, and moment functions, and investigate its extreme value behavior. Parameter estimation is addressed through multiple methods, with a focus on maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference, supported by a comprehensive simulation study. Applied to reliability datasets (carbon fiber strength and airborne transceiver repair times) the $ q $-Fréchet demonstrates a consistently superior fit compared to the classical Fréchet distribution, confirming its practical utility in modeling complex, heavy-tailed data. This work establishes the $ q $-Fréchet as a robust and adaptable model for applications in reliability engineering, survival analysis, and beyond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics in Applied Sciences and EngineeringSame topicStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207