MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417247079 · doi:10.48175/ijarsct-30412

Integrating Predictive Analytics with Customer Behavior Data in E-commerce Based on Machine Learning Model

2025· article· W4417247079 on OpenAlexaff
Moinul Islam

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCustomer churn and segmentation
Canadian institutionsAlgonquin College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkPredictive modellingConvolutional neural networkQuality (philosophy)Predictive analyticsCompetitor analysisRecallConsumer behaviour

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In modern competitive e-commerce, consumer behavior is vital to understand and predict to raise engagement, reduce churn, and streamline company strategy. Conventional machine learning models do not tend to capture complex and evolving consumer behavior, leading to mediocre prediction performance. The proposed paper presents a hybrid Model, which integrates the Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) networks to learn long-term sequential connections between consumer behavior data and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to extract local features. The mitigation of data quality and imbalance is done through the extensive preparation steps of the methodology, which involve handling missing values, one-hot encoding, min-max normalization, and SMOTE-based class balancing. Several additional models such as the Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Stochastic Gradient Boosting, SVM, and two novel models namely K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and CNN-BiLSTM were also tested and reviewed. The CNN-BiLSTM model scored significantly higher to its competitors with 97% accuracy (Acc), 99.8% recall (Rec) and 99.8% F1score, indicating a high ability to learn complex and non-linear patterns; KNN achieved 96% accuracy. The findings confirm the proposed methodology in terms of reliable and effective e-commerce customer turnover prediction

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0090.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and TechnologySame topicCustomer churn and segmentationFrench-language works237,207