SKK groups of manifolds and non-unitary invertible TQFTs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work considers the computation of controllable cut-and-paste groups $\mathrm{SKK}^ξ_n$ of manifolds with tangential structure $ξ:B_n\to BO_n$. To this end, we apply the work of Galatius-Madsen-Tillman-Weiss, Genauer and Schommer-Pries, who showed that for a wide range of structures $ξ$ these groups fit into a short exact sequence that relates them to bordism groups of $ξ$-manifolds with kernel generated by the disc-bounding $ξ$-sphere. The order of this sphere can be computed by knowing the possible values of the Euler characteristic of $ξ$-manifolds. We are thus led to address two key questions: the existence of $ξ$-manifolds with odd Euler characteristic of a given dimension and conditions for the exact sequence to admit a splitting. We resolve these questions in a wide range of cases. $\mathrm{SKK}$ groups are of interest in physics as they play a role in the classification of non-unitary invertible topological quantum field theories, which classify anomalies and symmetry protected topological (SPT) phases of matter. Applying our topological results, we give a complete classification of non-unitary invertible topological quantum field theories in the tenfold way in dimensions 1-5.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".