MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417252213 · doi:10.1080/10999949.2025.2593221

Groundings!: Contextualizing Educational Labour in Sustaining Black Revolutionary Movements

2023· article· en· W4417252213 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marsha Hinds Myrie

Bibliographic record

VenueSouls · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Race Theory in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial movementMovement (music)Work (physics)Neoliberalism (international relations)Capitalism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes community education within Bathurst, a Black community in Ontario, Canada. The major objective is to use Walter Rodney’s Groundings as an interpretive framework to establish continuities in Black (Caribbean) freedom efforts between those in the pre-independence and independence period (1930s to 1979) and contemporary activity. Groundings are a historical practice of community education for Black revolutionary initiatives. Community educational practices became an important tool in building revolutionary capacity and solidarity in Caribbean organizations because they build a critical bridge across the gap between idea and action. Idea and actions can belong to either intellectual elites or grassroots actors, but class factors usually result in a binary with the former restricted to intellectual elites and the latter arising from frustration and anti-discrimination efforts of (Black) masses. It is through community education that the binary is neutralized and revolutionary formation can build. Caribbean organizing was transnational in nature, and remain so today. Analyzing Diasporic spaces like Bathurst holds lessons for the Caribbean and vice versa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoulsSame topicCritical Race Theory in EducationFrench-language works237,207