MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417253654 · doi:10.14453/rdr.1754

Review: <em>The Black Thread</em> knits a compelling petroculture tale with a few dropped podcast stitches.

2025· article· W4417253654 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadioDoc Review · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRadio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNorwegianOil drillingOil explorationPetroleum industryHuman rights

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Black Thread is a four-part podcast miniseries about Norway’s oil and gas paradox co-produced by Amy Westervelt’s Drilled.media with NGOs KlimaKultur and The Norwegian Climate Foundation. The podcast explores the cultural role of oil in Norwegian society, examining how a country that values the environment and human rights can condone expanded oil and gas drilling at a time of 1.5 degree overshoot. While including a broad range of expert voices explaining how Norway views itself as a progressive climate leader while expanding its oil industry, it ultimately fails to make full use of the strengths of the podcast genre to challenge the country’s well-oiled climate obstruction machine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it