MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417261530 · doi:10.5539/jel.v15n2p222

An Occupational Stress Management Program for Physical Education Teachers in Rural Primary Schools: Implementation and Evaluation in Guangxi Province

2025· article· W4417261530 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhao Pan, Suttipong Hoksuwan, Pacharawit Chansirisira

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Education and Learning · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPhysical Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMahasarakham University
KeywordsStressorOccupational stressStress managementExperiential learningPhysical educationInterpersonal communicationRural areaData collectionWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physical education teachers in rural primary schools experience significant occupational stress that impacts their well-being, job satisfaction, and teaching effectiveness. The rapid implementation of China’s “health first” educational policy has intensified demands on rural physical education teachers, while existing support systems remain inadequate. This research aimed to: (1) investigate occupational stressors that affect physical education teachers in rural primary schools in Guangxi Province, (2) assess current and desired states of occupational stress management support systems, and (3) develop a comprehensive occupational stress management program based on contemporary adult learning theory. A three-phase sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Phase 1 validated five occupational stressor categories through expert consultation (n=5). Phase 2 assessed current and desired states using surveys with 378 stakeholders from rural primary schools. Phase 3 developed and validated a stress management program incorporating experiential learning (70%), peer learning (20%), and formal training (10%). Five primary stressor categories were identified: student situations, work situations, parent situations, interpersonal relationships, and occupational demands. Significant gaps existed between current support levels (X̅=1.92, low level) and desired support levels (X̅=4.01, high level), with improvement gaps ranging from 1.97 to 2.17 points across all stressor categories. Expert validation confirmed high program suitability (X̅=4.65) and feasibility (X̅=4.20). This study provides the first comprehensive framework for addressing occupational stress among rural physical education teachers in China. The developed program offers a systematic, evidence-based approach combining theory and practice with demonstrated high suitability and feasibility for implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.556
Teacher spread0.497 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Education and LearningSame topicPhysical Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207