Global signal regression reduces connectivity patterns related to physiological signals and does not alter EEG-derived connectivity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Functional brain connectivity measures extracted from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans have generated wide interest as potential noninvasive biomarkers. In this context, performing global signal regression (GSR) as a preprocessing step remains controversial. Specifically, while it has been shown that a considerable fraction of global signal variations is associated with physiological and motion sources, GSR may also result in removing neural activity. Methods: Here, we address this question by examining the fundamental sources of resting global signal fluctuations using simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG)-fMRI data combined with cardiac and breathing recordings. Results: Our results suggest that systemic physiological fluctuations account for a significantly larger fraction of global signal variability compared to electrophysiological fluctuations. Furthermore, we show that GSR reduces artifactual connectivity due to heart rate and breathing fluctuations, but preserves connectivity patterns associated with electrophysiological activity within the alpha and beta frequency ranges. Discussion: Overall, these results provide evidence that the neural component of resting-state fMRI-based connectivity is preserved after the global signal is regressed out.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".