MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417268182 · doi:10.1103/7xy6-jq3c

Characterization of mini-CryoCube detectors from the RICOCHET experiment commissioning at the Institut Laue-Langevin

2025· article· en· W4417268182 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesInstitut des Origines de LyonHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeUniversité de LyonCanada First Research Excellence FundAgence Nationale de la RechercheNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionU.S. Department of EnergyEuropean Research CouncilHeising-Simons FoundationMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian FederationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsRecoilDetectorMuonNoise (video)CoincidenceNeutronSemiconductor detectorFissionParticle detector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The experiment aims to measure the coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering process from antineutrinos emitted by a research nuclear reactor operated by the Institut Laue-Langevin (Grenoble, France). This article presents a description of the experimental installation and the detector performance achieved during its commissioning with a mini-CryoCube module consisting of three 42-g germanium cryogenic calorimeters. The baseline resolutions and background levels are reported both during reactor-on and reactor-off periods and as noise mitigation techniques were improved. A baseline resolution of 40 eV electron equivalent was achieved for the ionization channel after setup improvements, and the phonon channel resolutions ranged from 50 to 80 eV of total phonon energy. In the energy region from 2 to 7 keV, a nuclear recoil rate of <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mrow> <a:mn>14</a:mn> <a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo> <a:mn>3</a:mn> <a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo> <a:mtext> </a:mtext> <a:mtext> </a:mtext> <a:mi>events</a:mi> <a:mo>/</a:mo> <a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo> <a:mi>kg</a:mi> <a:mtext> </a:mtext> <a:mi>day</a:mi> <a:mtext> </a:mtext> <a:mtext> </a:mtext> <a:mi>keV</a:mi> <a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:math> is measured during the reactor-off period selecting events in coincidence with muon veto signals. This rate is in agreement with the cosmogenic neutron rate calculated from GEANT4 simulations. After the rejection of events in coincidence with signals in the muon veto detectors, a combined 90% confidence level limit on the nuclear recoil background of <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:mrow> <g:mo form="prefix">&lt;</g:mo> <g:mn>9</g:mn> <g:mtext> </g:mtext> <g:mtext> </g:mtext> <g:mi>events</g:mi> <g:mo>/</g:mo> <g:mo stretchy="false">(</g:mo> <g:mi>kg</g:mi> <g:mtext> </g:mtext> <g:mi>day</g:mi> <g:mtext> </g:mtext> <g:mi>keV</g:mi> <g:mo stretchy="false">)</g:mo> </g:mrow> </g:math> is obtained in that energy region during the reactor-on period, which is compatible with our GEANT4 model calculation corresponding to a total rate of <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <l:mrow> <l:mn>5</l:mn> <l:mtext> </l:mtext> <l:mtext> </l:mtext> <l:mi>events</l:mi> <l:mo>/</l:mo> <l:mo stretchy="false">(</l:mo> <l:mi>kg</l:mi> <l:mtext> </l:mtext> <l:mi>day</l:mi> <l:mtext> </l:mtext> <l:mi>keV</l:mi> <l:mo stretchy="false">)</l:mo> </l:mrow> </l:math> . The sensitivity of this analysis was however found to be limited by a surface event contamination which is currently being addressed by the Collaboration with upgraded detectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.410 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207