MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417271794 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-27441-8

Pedestrian detection in aerial image based on convolutional neural network with attention mechanism and multi-scale prediction

2025· article· en· W4417271794 on OpenAlexaff
Jiaxi Yang, Jiaquan Shen, Shitong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersHenan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project
KeywordsPedestrian detectionConvolutional neural networkObject detectionPedestrianAerial imageObject (grammar)Deep learningPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pedestrian object detection is crucial in intelligent systems such as traffic management and surveillance. Traditional machine learning methods have shown drawbacks, including low accuracy and slow processing. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based algorithms have achieved notable progress, but mainstream CNNs still struggle with slow speed and low accuracy, particularly for small and occluded targets from aerial perspectives. In this paper, we propose a Multi-Scale Attention YOLO (MSA-YOLO) algorithm to address these issues. MSA-YOLO incorporates a Squeeze, Excitation, and Cross Stage Partial (SECSP) channel attention module to extract richer pedestrian features with minimal additional parameters. A multi-scale prediction module is also introduced to capture information across different scales, improving small object detection and reducing missed detections. To evaluate our approach, we manually collect and annotate the Aerial Pedestrian dataset (AP dataset), which, to our knowledge, provides more annotations, varied scenes, and diverse view angles than comparable existing datasets. The high-resolution images in the AP dataset allow for capturing more detailed pedestrian features, which can enhance model performance. Experimental results show that, on the AP dataset, MSA-YOLO demonstrates clear advantages over several widely used object detection and pedestrian detection models developed in recent years, indicating its potential dual benefits in terms of accuracy and efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207