MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Improved Spatial-Temporal CAR Models for Dengue Fever Incidence: Evidence from Banyumas

2025· article· W4417272092 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jajang, Mashuri Mashuri, Novita Eka Chandra, Budi Pratikno

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDengue and Mosquito Control Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJenderal Soedirman University
KeywordsDengue feverDengue hemorrhagic feverPopulationOffset (computer science)Dengue virusAutoregressive model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the last six years, dengue fever cases in Banyumas Regency in 2024 were very high. The relative risk (RR) of dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) is of interest. In this paper, we proposed the Spatial Temporal-Conditional Autoregressive (ST-CAR) model to analyze the association of DHF with related factors. In addition, we improve the model with offset modification on ST-CAR. The results of research showed that the best ST-CAR model was the interaction of intrinsic CAR and independent identically distributed temporal effects. In addition, the offset modification in the ST-CAR model resulted in the smallest Watanabe-Akaike Information Criterion (WAIC). Based on the study's findings, the two highest RR from year to year are located not far from the city center (North Purwokerto) and the tourist attraction (Baturaden). Both locations are often associated with higher risk factors such as population density and greater social interaction, which facilitate transmission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Analysis and ApplicationsSame topicDengue and Mosquito Control ResearchFrench-language works237,207