MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417273779 · doi:10.12927/hcq.2025.27735

Fifteen Years of Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behaviour Therapy in Saskatchewan: Expanding Access to Evidence-Based Care

2025· article· en· W4417273779 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Heather D. Hadjistavropoulos, Vanessa Peynenburg

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Quarterly · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDigital Mental Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive behaviour therapyMental healthService delivery frameworkCognitionPublic healthBest practiceService (business)Unit (ring theory)Key (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) is the most researched form of digital mental health care, with strong evidence across diverse conditions. This article presents 15 years of ICBT implementation in Saskatchewan through the Online Therapy Unit (OTU), Canada's longest-running publicly funded ICBT service. With over 14,300 clients served, the OTU integrates service delivery and research, offering transdiagnostic and condition-specific courses with brief therapist support. Key facilitators include program credibility, adaptability, strong partnerships, dedicated infrastructure and personnel and a learning health system approach. Challenges include evolving technological expectations and improving public awareness. The OTU provides a compelling model for scaling ICBT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare Quarterly→Same topicDigital Mental Health Interventions→French-language works237,207→