A participatory systematic review on human rights and the birth of a child with albinism in sub-Saharan Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The period surrounding birth is a crucial and determining time for many women, particularly for those who give birth to a child with albinism (CWA) due to the stigma, discrimination, and threat to safety they immediately encounter, altering their life trajectory. Objectives: To synthesize existing evidence on the human rights surrounding the birth of a baby with albinism in sub-Saharan Africa. Design: We conducted an integrative review through a critical participatory approach. Our review question was; What are the experiences surrounding the birth of a CWA for the mother and father and their carers in sub-Saharan Africa? Data sources and methods: Our study included 35 academic and 47 gray literature articles and reports (for a total of 82 sources) from 9 academic databases and hand searches with relevant sources. We employed a convergent integrated approach to data synthesis and thematic analysis methods. Our study included 82 academic and gray literature articles and reports from 9 academic databases and hand searches with relevant sources. Results: Drawing on African-based perspectives, together with strengths-based, trauma- and violence-informed care, we analyzed the complex lived experiences of mothers who have given birth to a CWA and explored potential sites for transformative change. We identified four themes: (1) Immediate Experiences: The Life-Defining Moment of Birth synthesized the experiences and responses of mothers, families, communities, and health providers to a birth to a baby with albinism; (2) Violent Response to the Birth of a Baby with Albinism depicted the obstetrical violence, symbolic violence of stigma, discrimination, and social exclusion, gendered and sexualized violence, and violence against the baby with albinism; (3) Mediating Sites of Structural Violence and Protective Factors revealed the multiple and interlocking structural sites that deepen the violence shaping the birth experience; and (4) State as Duty Bearer: Human Rights Obligations and the Policy Determinants of Health spotlighted the gaps of and recommendations to the States as duty bearers. Conclusion: Our review revealed not only a matrix of structural violence that characterizes the experience of mothers but also protective factors that become visible with a strengths-based framing. Registration: Open Science Framework (OSF) registration, DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/83KMC
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".