MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417278807 · doi:10.2478/ffp-2025-0025

Plants, fungi, and invertebrates of Northern red oak <i>(Quercus rubra</i> L.) experimental stands in Rogów Arboretum (Poland)

2025· article· en· W4417278807 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tomasz Dobies, Andrzej M. Jagodziński, Izabela Kałucka, M. Kasprowicz, Maria Wojterska, Małgorzata Sławska, Anna Wierzbicka, Andrzej Łabędzki, Mirosław Nowiński, Stanisław Małek, Piotr Karolewski, Jacek Oleksyn, Piotr Banaszczak, Jacek Malica, Maciej Skorupski

Bibliographic record

VenueFolia Forestalia Polonica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvertebrateTaxonBiodiversityIntroduced speciesRange (aeronautics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A bstract This paper gives a survey of biodiversity of Northern red oak ( Quercus rubra L.) stands in Rogów Arboretum on the background of environmental data. Northern red oak is found throughout much of the eastern United States and southeastern Canada and occurs on sites with a wide variety of soil types and topographic positions. In Poland, it is considered an invasive plant, dangerous to the native flora. During the study, 36 taxa of vascular plants, mosses, and liverworts; 40 taxa of fungi; and 112 taxa of invertebrates were found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFolia Forestalia PolonicaSame topicForest Ecology and Biodiversity StudiesFrench-language works237,207