MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417279024 · doi:10.5194/ica-abs-10-104-2025

Waterloo Urban Scene Dataset: An Annotation-Efficient Dataset for Urban Scene Classification with Minimal Supervision

2025· article· en· W4417279024 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts of the ICA · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsUrban planningField (mathematics)Feature (linguistics)Identification (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-definition (HD) urban scene mapping is crucial for urban applications and autonomous driving.However, achieving high performance in HD mapping requires large amounts of high-quality annotated data.While the SkyScape dataset is valuable, it is limited by its focus on lane markings in Germany.In this paper, we present the Waterloo Urban Scene Dataset, built upon the Waterloo Building Dataset, designed for minimal supervision deep learning.The dataset includes 907 well-annotated, 775 roughly annotated, and 23,172 intact patches (512 512 pixels, 0.12m/pixel resolution in RGB).Combined with the SkyScape dataset, it supports HD urban scene mapping with minimal supervision.Future work will focus on benchmarking and method development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it