MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417280384 · doi:10.1016/j.psj.2025.106262

Significance of specialty protein ingredients in feeding programs for broiler chickens on nitrogen utilization and excretion-A meta-analysis

2025· article· en· W4417280384 on OpenAlexafffund
Felix M Njeri, Elijah G. Kiarie, J.L. Ellis

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersOntario Agri-Food Innovation AllianceAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Poultry Research Council
KeywordsBroilerIngredientStarterFeed conversion ratioMealSoybean mealExcretionAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Specialty protein ingredients (SPI) such as processed animal proteins (PAP), insect proteins (IP), algae, and further-processed vegetable proteins (PVP), are increasingly incorporated into broiler diets. However, variation in crude protein (CP) intake and the inclusion levels of these ingredients across studies can confound their reported effects. To address this heterogeneity, the present meta-analysis used a mixed-effects meta-regression model that adjusted performance responses for both CP intake and SPI inclusion level, enabling a standardized comparison of ingredient efficacy. The hypothesis was that PVP and PAP would perform similarly to conventional soybean meal (SBM) and outperform IP and algae due to their higher digestibility and more balanced amino acid profiles reported in the literature. Data from 53 peer-reviewed studies were integrated into a mixed-effects model (PROC GLIMMIX, SAS), with study as a random effect and SPI type and CP intake as fixed effects. The model predictions were average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and nitrogen balance. During the starter and grower phases, PVP, PAP and SBM resulted in the highest ADG and 8-15% reduction in nitrogen excretion (P < 0.001). In the finisher phase, SBM had the highest overall performance, while PVP and PAP had similar results (P < 0.001). The performance response to CP intake revealed that algae had the steepest positive slopes at low intake and the largest quadratic declines at higher intakes (P < 0.001). IP also showed quadratic performance declines at higher intake levels (P < 0.001), particularly above 10 % inclusion. PVP and SBM showed minimal quadratic effects, and PAP showed a moderate decline in nitrogen efficiency in the finisher phase (P < 0.01). In conclusion, PVP and PAP are effective alternative protein sources. In contrast, algae and high inclusion of IP are less suitable because of their lower protein quality. These findings offer a quantitative basis for feed formulation and guide future research aimed at improving the digestibility and amino acid profiles of algae and IP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207