Botulism Sequelae: A Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Botulism is a life-threatening neuroparalytic disease caused by botulinum neurotoxins. While its acute phase has been extensively studied, long-term sequelae following recovery remain insufficiently explored. This systematic review aims to comprehensively assess and synthesize available evidence on post-botulism sequelae to improve understanding and guide future research. Methods A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE via Ovid, and Web of Science from inception to 24 June 2024. Eligible studies included observational studies, case series, and case reports describing post-recovery symptoms in individuals diagnosed with foodborne, wound, or infant botulism, excluding iatrogenic cases. The risk of bias was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists. Results Out of 340 screened records, 9 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 2 case-control studies (n = 230 botulism cases, n = 669 controls) and 7 cohort studies (n = 185 botulism cases). Most studies reported some short- and/or long-term consequences of botulism. Among 3 studies homogeneously reporting sequelae symptomatology, the most frequently reported long-term symptoms included fatigue (66.2%, range 47.9%–84.6%), limitations in vigorous activities (55.8%, range 47.6%–64.0%), general weakness (57.1%, range 43.1%–76.9%), and dyspnea (42.9%, range 18.0%–92.3%). In some patients, psychosocial dysfunction persisted longer than physical impairments, over the 6-year period post intoxication. Two studies provided comparative data with control groups, demonstrating significantly higher prevalence of fatigue, weakness, and impaired health perception in botulism survivors. Additionally, 14 case reports and case series (n = 43 individuals) reported similar patterns with dyspnea, fatigue, and autonomic dysfunction among the most reported sequelae. Conclusions This systematic review highlights significant long-term sequelae among botulism survivors, particularly fatigue, respiratory impairment, and psychosocial dysfunction. While recovery trajectories suggest improvement over time, persistent symptoms may impact quality of life. Standardized outcome measures and longitudinal studies are needed to elucidate the burden of post-botulism sequelae further and inform clinical management strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.046 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.016 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".