MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Zero-Forcing Assisted RFMD Detection of SE-MOCZ for Non-Coherent Short Packet Communications

2025· article· W4417282067 on OpenAlexaff
Aiman Asad Siddiqui, Ebrahim Bedeer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDetectorFilter (signal processing)Control theory (sociology)Modulation (music)Network packetReciprocalAccelerationPolynomialNyquist–Shannon sampling theorem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the detection of spectrally-efficient modulation on conjugate reciprocal zeros (SE-MOCZ) as a promising non-coherent modulation for short packet communications (SPCs). SE-MOCZ combines the recently proposed MOCZ and faster-than-Nyquist (FTN) signaling, by accelerating the pulses carrying the polynomial coefficients of MOCZ beyond the Nyquist limit, which introduces inter-polynomial-coefficient-interference (IPCI) and increases the number of the received complex zeros in the z-domain. We propose to use zero forcing (ZF) to assist the root-finding-minimum-distance (RFMD) detector of SE-MOCZ without the need to optimize the radius or to use the partial-complex-zeros-removal filter. In particular, given that the complex zeros due to the IPCI are fully known at the receiver, ZF can cancel such complex zeros, and hence, assist the RFMD detection. Simulation results show that the proposed ZF-RFMD detector outperforms the RFMD detector that adopts optimal radius and partial-complex-zeros-removal filter (up to 4 dB saving in E<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">b</inf>/N<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0</inf> at the same error rate). Additionally, the proposed ZF-RFMD detector helps SE-MOCZ to approach the performance of MOCZ for high values of the FTN signaling acceleration parameter (up to 8.9% SE gain with no additional increase in E<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">b</inf>/N<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0</inf>).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207