Federated Learning for UAV-based Spectrum Sensing: Enhancing Accuracy Through SNR-Weighted Model Aggregation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing demand for data usage in wireless communications requires using wider bands in the spectrum, especially for backhaul links. Yet, allocations in the spectrum for non-communication systems inhibit merging bands to achieve wider bandwidth. To overcome this issue, spectrum-sharing or opportunistic spectrum utilization by secondary users stands out as a promising solution. However, both approaches must minimize interference to primary users. Therefore, spectrum sensing becomes vital for such opportunistic usage, ensuring the proper operation of the primary users. Although this problem has been investigated for two-dimensional networks, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) networks need different approaches concerning three-dimensional space, its challenges, and opportunities. For this purpose, we propose a federated learning (FL)-based method for spectrum sensing in UAV networks to account for their distributed nature and limited computational capacity. FL enables local training without sharing raw data while guaranteeing the privacy of local users, lowering communication overhead, and increasing data diversity. Furthermore, we develop a federated aggregation method, namely FedSNR, that considers the signal-to-noise ratio observed by UAVs to acquire a global model. The numerical results show that the proposed architecture and the aggregation method outperform traditional methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".