React-to-Me: A Conversational Interface for Interactive Exploration of the Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase (www.reactome.org) provides expert-curated information on human biological pathways, molecular interactions, and disease mechanisms. However, its complex data model and keyword-based search interface present accessibility barriers for non-expert users. In contrast, general-purpose conversational AI systems offer intuitive natural language interfaces but lack the domain-specificity, transparent sourcing, and factual reliability required for scientific applications. To address this gap, we developed React-to-Me (https://reactome.org/chat), a domain-specific conversational assistant that enables users to query Reactome using natural language while maintaining scientific rigor and source traceability. React-to-Me integrates hybrid retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with constrained language model generation to ensure that all responses are grounded in curated Reactome content and directly linked to corresponding knowledgebase entries. When internal coverage is insufficient, the system defers to trusted external biomedical sources rather than generating speculative or unverified content. Computational benchmarking confirmed that combining semantic vector search with keyword-based matching substantially improved contextual grounding and factual precision relative to dense-only retrieval baselines. In blinded expert evaluations, grounded responses were more likely to receive higher quality ratings than ungrounded counterparts, with significant gains in factual accuracy, biological specificity, and mechanistic depth. User surveys further indicated strong satisfaction with ease of use, citation reliability, and factual accuracy. These findings demonstrate that domain-specific grounding can markedly improve the reliability and usability of conversational AI for biological knowledge exploration. React-to-Me provides a transparent and scientifically robust interface for accessing and exploring Reactome content and is freely available at https://reactome.org/chat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".