MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

COMPACT ABSORBER TECHNOLOGY LEADS TO SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN THE COST OF POINT SOURCE CO2 CAPTURE

2025· article· en· W4417286615 on OpenAlexaff
Reynolds A. Frimpong, Heather Nikolic, Kunlei Liu, Babul Patel, Bruce Burke

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Energy for a Clean Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarbon Engineering (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)Point (geometry)Point sourceCost reductionAbsorption (acoustics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The size of columns in traditional absorption-based processes for CO<sub>2</sub> capture contributes significantly to the overall capital cost. A demonstrated method to reduce the cost of point source CO<sub>2</sub> capture, focusing on reducing the absorber height by increasing the liquid-to-gas reaction contact area and decreasing the CO<sub>2</sub> diffusion resistance without increasing gas-side pressure drop is presented along with techno-economic analysis results. Bench-scale tests on the unique Compact Absorber showed overall CO<sub>2</sub> mass transfer enhancement of varying degrees compared to a traditional packed column for similar process conditions, demonstrating that a +60% reduction in size of a typical postcombustion absorber with a packing height of 70-100 ft and total height of 150-180 ft can be achieved. The techno-economic analysis showed significant cost reductions when the Compact Absorber is combined with other transformative aspects of the University of Kentucky Institute for Decarbonization and Energy Advancement point source CO<sub>2</sub> capture process compared to the US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory pertinent reference case for pulverized coal plants with CO<sub>2</sub> capture. A levelized cost of electricity excluding CO<sub>2</sub> transportation and storage of $95.6/MWh was estimated, which is a 9% reduction, with a total capital cost contribution of $45/MWh, which is a 12% reduction. Additionally, a breakeven CO<sub>2</sub> sales price, also referred to as the cost of CO<sub>2</sub> capture, of $36.70/tonne was estimated when the University of Kentucky hindered primary amine solvent is used, which is a 20% reduction compared to the reference case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Energy for a Clean EnvironmentSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207