Integrated whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing reveals divergent evolutionary processes across biliary tract cancer subtypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Biliary tract cancer (BTC) comprises a family of rare malignancies subclassified by anatomy and pathology. However, this scheme may obscure shared biology and limit patient stratification. Objectives We tested whether BTC heterogeneity can be explained by coherent latent axes and evaluated the potential to unify diverse clinical and genomic factors under a tractable biological framework Methods We performed whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing of 180 tumors enriched for tumor cells by laser capture microdissection to identify shared programs in BTC. Results Network integration across transcriptomic classes identified two consensus cancer subtypes (CCS). CCS segregated with anatomical location of primary tumor and gene expression marker analyses suggest subtypes reflect tumor cell of origin differences. CCS displayed strikingly divergent molecular landscapes, explaining more variance than anatomical location of primary tumor. CCS-B tumors were mutationally loaded with clock-like and APOBEC signatures and extrachromosomal DNA, whereas CCS-A tumors were characterized by chromosome-arm deletions. Conclusion Our approach showed that harnessing the genomic and transcriptomic diversity of BTC uncovers novel biology and improves stratification. Significance We provide evidence that biliary tract consensus cancer subtypes define fundamentally different cancers, with diverging modes of evolution stemming from distinct cells of origin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".