MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417289690 · doi:10.1177/17103568251404946

The Dual Role of <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> in Atopic Dermatitis: Pathobiont and Protector

2025· review· en· W4417289690 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mahsa Khosrojerdi, Seyed Ahmad Hashemi, Ali Haghbin, Reza Besharati, Amir Azimian

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatitis · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Atopic dermatitisPathogenDual roleQuorum sensingDual (grammatical number)Function (biology)Dual function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Staphylococcus epidermidis is a ubiquitous skin commensal with a complex and dual role in atopic dermatitis (AD). While it contributes to skin barrier function and pathogen defense, it also acts as an opportunistic pathogen in the dysbiotic AD skin environment. This review explores the complex interplay between its beneficial and pathogenic behaviors specifically in the context of AD through a comprehensive literature analysis. S. epidermidis exhibits strain-specific pathogenicity, directly contributing to AD pathology via the EcpA protease and lesional biofilms. Conversely, it engages in microbial antagonism, inhibiting Staphylococcus aureus through quorum sensing disruption and bacteriocin production, offering protective benefits in AD. Its role as a reservoir for antibiotic resistance genes, however, complicates treatment. This duality underscores the need for strain-specific approaches for managing AD to harness its benefits while mitigating its risks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDermatitis→Same topicDermatology and Skin Diseases→French-language works237,207→