MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417290464 · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2025.117761

Predicting skeletal age from HR-pQCT imaging

2025· article· en· W4417290464 on OpenAlexafffund
Annabel R Bugbird, Steven K. Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenueBone · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Bone and Joint Health Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMeasure (data warehouse)Identification (biology)Interpretation (philosophy)Quantitative computed tomographyComputed tomographyBone structureVolume (thermodynamics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) provides detailed bone microarchitecture assessments, but the interpretability of its many complex parameters remains challenging. This study aimed to develop a deep learning model to estimate skeletal age from HR-pQCT scans, offering an interpretable, quantitative summary of bone health relative to chronological age. METHODS: The training dataset included 1236 adults (62.1% female) from a normative cohort, and an independent test set of 460 adults (69.3% female). HR-pQCT scans of the distal radius and tibia were acquired for all participants. Five models were trained: 2D models using a single radius (2DRad) and tibia (2DTib) slice from the middle of the scan; 3D models using full volumetric radius (3DRad) and tibia (3DTib); and a combined 2D model (2DRadTib) applying linear regression to the 2D outputs. RESULTS: = 0.85). Saliency maps revealed cortical bone was most influential in younger individuals, while both cortical and trabecular features contributed in older participants. Predicted skeletal age was strongly correlated with established HR-pQCT parameters, particularly cortical and density measures (ρ = -0.51 to 0.85), indicating the model relies on key bone features. CONCLUSION: We present a novel deep learning framework for skeletal age prediction from HR-pQCT, providing a concise and interpretable summary measure of bone health. This approach may enhance the clinical utility of HR-pQCT by improving interpretability and supporting early identification of accelerated skeletal aging. LAY SUMMARY: High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) provides detailed images of bone structure, but the volume and complexity of data can make interpretation difficult. In this study, we developed a deep learning model to estimate skeletal age from HR-pQCT scans, offering a simplified and interpretable measure of bone health. By translating complex imaging data into an age-based summary, this approach may enhance clinical use of HR-pQCT, support early identification of individuals at risk of accelerated bone loss, and improve patient understanding by providing a relatable measure of skeletal integrity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBoneSame topicForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207