MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417296815 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaf116.040

40 17-year retrospective population-based study of neonatal sepsis in British Columbia

2025· article· en· W4417296815 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eva B. Vedel Jensen, Allison W. Watts, Marina Viñeta Paramo, Niranjan Kissoon, Sarka Lisonkova, Pascal M. Lavoie

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and Maternal Infections
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSepsisIncidence (geometry)Gestational ageNeonatal sepsisRetrospective cohort studyBlood cultureCohortCohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Sepsis is responsible for about one third of neonatal deaths worldwide. Preterm infants are at higher risk of sepsis than term infants. However, contemporary population-based data are scarce and the risks of neonatal sepsis associated with gestational age at delivery are understudied. Objectives To determine the population-based incidence of neonatal sepsis in British Columbia (BC), Canada and to examine changes in the risk of sepsis by gestational age at delivery. Design/Methods A population-based retrospective cohort study including all children born in BC from 2004 to 2020, capturing hospital admissions up to the first 28 days of life. Data were obtained from the BC Perinatal Data Registry. The primary outcome was sepsis, identified by ICD-10 diagnostic codes or a confirmed positive blood culture abstracted from medical charts. Secondary outcomes included explicit sepsis (ICD-10 codes explicitly mentioning sepsis), implicit sepsis (cases of severe infection associated with an organ dysfunction ICD-10 code), culture-positive sepsis (bacterial or fungal blood culture), and septic shock. Incidence proportions were calculated as the number of sepsis cases per 1,000 live births, stratified by gestational age (in weeks) and birth year. Results Of the 722,264 live-born infants in the cohort, 3,537 had sepsis (4.86 per 1,000 live births). In preterm infants (<37 weeks), the incidence was 23.9 per 1,000 live births versus 2.8 per 1,000 in term infants. This difference highlights the increased vulnerability of preterm infants to sepsis, which may be due to their underdeveloped immune systems, organs, or other physiological factors. For secondary outcomes, there were 793 cases of culture-positive sepsis, 2,635 cases of explicit sepsis, 280 cases of implicit sepsis and 244 cases of septic shock. The incidence of all types of sepsis decreased with increasing gestational age (Figure 1). Bacterial sepsis was more common than viral or fungal sepsis (overall incidence of 3.5 cases per 1,000 live births). Fungal sepsis had higher incidence at <31 weeks (6.12 cases per 1,000 live births at 25 weeks). Since 2004, the incidence of sepsis has been decreasing in BC. Conclusion This study found that the incidence of sepsis in preterm infants was lower than that reported in the literature, which tends to focus on NICU populations. The population-level incidence of sepsis was much higher in preterm compared with term infants. Therefore, targeted prevention strategies and early interventions for preterm infants are essential to reduce the burden of sepsis and improve neonatal outcomes at a population level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsFrench-language works237,207