BONBID-HIE 2023: Lesion Segmentation Challenge in BOston Neonatal Brain Injury Data for Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) represents a brain dysfunction, affecting approximately 1 to 5 per 1000 full-term neonates. The precise delineation and segmentation of HIE-related lesions in neonatal brain Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) are pivotal in advancing outcome predictions, identifying patients at high risk, elucidating neurological manifestations, and assessing treatment efficacies. Despite its importance, the development of algorithms for segmenting HIE lesions from MRI volumes has been impeded by data scarcity. Addressing this critical gap, we organized the first BONBID-HIE challenge with diffusion MRI data (Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps) for HIE lesion segmentation, in conjunction with the MICCAI 2023. Totally 14 algorithms were submitted, employing a gamut of cutting-edge automatic machine-learning-based segmentation algorithms. Our comprehensive analysis of HIE lesion segmentation and submitted algorithms facilitates an in-depth evaluation of the current technological zenith, outlines directions for future advancements, and highlights persistent hurdles. To foster ongoing research and benchmarking, the annotated HIE dataset, developed algorithm dockers, and unified evaluation codes are accessible through a dedicated online platform (https://bonbid-hie2023.grand-challenge.org).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".