An Information-State Based Approach to Linear Time Varying System Identification and Control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper considers the problem of system identification for linear time-varying systems. We propose a new system realization approach that uses an “information-state” as the state vector, where the information-state is composed of a finite number of past inputs and outputs. Using this framework, we develop a system identification algorithm that uses input–output data to fit an autoregressive moving average model (ARMA) to represent the current output in terms of finite past inputs and outputs. This information-state-based approach allows us to directly realize a state-space model using the estimated time-varying ARMA parameters for linear time-varying (LTV) systems. The paper develops the theoretical foundation for using ARMA parameters-based system representation using only the concept of linear observability, details the reasoning for exact output modeling using only the finite history, and shows that there is no need to separate the free and the forced response for identification. The paper also discusses the implications of using the information-state system for optimal output feedback control and shows that the solution obtained using a suitably posed information-state problem is optimal for the original problem. The proposed approach is tested on various different systems, and the performance is compared with state-of-the-art LTV system identification techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".