Pemetaan Paket Wisata Terintegrasi Menuju Kawasan Strategis Pariwisata Nasional (KSPN) Melalui Pelabuhan Tanjung Batu, Berau, Kalimantan Timur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan jalur wisata terintegrasi pada rute Tanjung Redeb menuju Pelabuhan Tanjung Batu, Kabupaten Berau, Kalimantan Timur, sebagai akses strategis menuju Kawasan Strategis Pariwisata Nasional (KSPN) Kepulauan Derawan. Meskipun berada pada posisi yang penting, Pelabuhan Tanjung Batu belum dimanfaatkan secara optimal sebagai bagian dari pengalaman perjalanan wisata dan lebih banyak berfungsi sebagai titik transit saja. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif melalui observasi lapangan, wawancara, Focus Group Discussion (FGD), serta pemetaan atraksi wisata alam, budaya, dan tematik pada jalur darat tersebut. Luaran penelitian meliputi papan informasi wisata, guidebook terintegrasi, brosur, serta pelaksanaan pilot trip untuk menguji kelayakan rute. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa jalur wisata terintegrasi berpotensi kuat menjadi koridor wisata pendukung yang mampu meningkatkan pengalaman wisatawan, memperkuat ekonomi lokal, serta membangun sinergi multipihak melalui pendekatan hexahelix pariwisata. Penelitian juga menekankan pentingnya kolaborasi berkelanjutan, penguatan informasi aksesibilitas, dan pengembangan produk wisata berbasis komunitas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".