MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417304748 · doi:10.1002/epi.70057

Cardiorespiratory cross‐frequency coupling biomarker for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy

2025· article· en· W4417304748 on OpenAlexafffund
Adam C. Gravitis, Richard Wennberg, Peter L. Carlen, Yotin Chinvarun, Victor Lira, Juliana Laze, Orrin Devinsky, Berj L. Bardakjian

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of OntarioUniversity of TorontoFinding A Cure for Epilepsy and Seizures
KeywordsCardiorespiratory fitnessEpilepsyBiomarkerCardiorespiratory arrestIctalSudden deathWearable computer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) often follows generalized tonic-clonic seizures during sleep, likely resulting from impaired brainstem cardiorespiratory function. We used ictal electrocardiogram (ECG)-based cross-frequency phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) to detect cardiorespiratory disruptions, comparing SUDEP to non-SUDEP cohorts. Leveraging respiratory modulation of ECG signals can provide a robust indirect proxy of respiratory monitoring despite high-amplitude noise. METHODS: We analyzed ictal ECG and electroencephalographic recordings in 21 SUDEP cases and 21 non-SUDEP epilepsy controls. Ictal ECG segments from 76 seizures (38 SUDEP, 38 non-SUDEP) were processed using continuous wavelet transformation to compute PAC between respiratory (.1-.55 Hz, 6-33 breaths per minute) and cardiac (.7-3.7 Hz, 42-222 beats per minute) frequencies. Relative PAC coupling strength was evaluated for respiratory frequencies > .25 Hz (15 breaths per minute) and cardiac frequencies > 1.7 Hz (102 beats per minute). Furthermore, a 3 × 3 grid of PAC ranges was derived for each 20-s window, yielding 18 features (mean and SD) as inputs to a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Elevated ictal PAC at higher respiratory (>.25 Hz, p < .0001) and cardiac (>1.7 Hz, p < .0142) frequencies in SUDEP patients suggests ictal respiration modulates ictal tachycardia, leading to cardiorespiratory dysfunction, probably brainstem-mediated. The logistic model accurately distinguished 38 seizures in SUDEP cases from 38 seizures in non-SUDEP cases (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve = 91%). Seizures in SUDEP patients had higher propensity scores (p < .001) both per seizure and per patient. All six test seizures (three SUDEP, three non-SUDEP) were correctly classified using the optimal threshold. SIGNIFICANCE: Ictal ECG-based PAC analysis is a potential noninvasive biomarker for SUDEP risk, capturing cardiorespiratory dysregulation during seizures. Its integration into wearable ECG devices could enable real-time risk assessment, informing clinical interventions such as rescue medications, antiseizure medication adjustments, or surgical evaluations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207