MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417307142 · doi:10.1002/cssc.202502422

Photocatalytic Upgrade of Primary Alcohols to Value‐Added Aldehydes by Carbon Nitride and Related Systems

2025· review· en· W4417307142 on OpenAlexaff
Shiyun Liu, Jung‐Ho Yun, Mu Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenueChemSusChem · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotocatalysisSelectivityCatalysisCarbon nitrideEnvironmentally friendlyPrimary (astronomy)Carbon fibersSurface modification

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The solar-driven photocatalytic oxidation of primary alcohols to aldehydes has emerged as a sustainable route for chemical manufacturing, offering an environmentally friendly alternative to conventional thermal and metal-catalyzed methods that rely on harsh conditions and toxic oxidants. Among reported systems, polymeric carbon nitride (PCN) has demonstrated exceptional selectivity toward value-added aldehydes, including formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, glyceraldehyde, and benzaldehyde. This work reviews recent progress in PCN-based photocatalysts for upgrading methanol, ethanol, glycerol, and benzyl alcohol, with emphasis on modification strategies, including catalyst design and engineering that promote charge separation and surface reactivity, often achieving near-quantitative selectivity. Despite these advances, low product yields remain a challenge, limited by sluggish carrier dynamics, narrow light absorption, and surface kinetics. We further highlight emerging detection techniques, mechanistic insights, and future directions to bridge selectivity with productivity for scalable solar-driven synthesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemSusChemSame topicAdvanced Photocatalysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207