MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417310503 · doi:10.1113/jp289303

Endocrine and androgenic response to altitude training in professional cyclists

2025· article· en· W4417310503 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Raphaël Faiss, Bastien Krumm, Claes Cubel, Magnus Bak Klaris, Lasse Vestli Bækken, Yvette Dehnes, Jenna M. Goodrum, Geoffrey D. Miller, James Spragg, Martin Faulhaber, Francesco Botrè, Carsten Lundby

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTeam DanmarkWorld Anti-Doping Agency
KeywordsEndocrine systemTestosterone (patch)Altitude trainingAltitude (triangle)Effects of high altitude on humansHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study investigated endocrine and steroidal blood markers in 31 male elite cyclists monitored over 7 weeks, including a 3 week altitude training camp either at 2050 m ( n = 19) or 3000 m ( n = 12). Serum samples were analysed for steroidal [e.g. testosterone (T)] and endocrine [i.e. insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF‐1) and N‐terminal propeptide type III procollagen (P‐III‐NP)] variables. Total haemoglobin mass (Hbmass) and plasma volume (PV) were measured by CO‐rebreathing. After 21 days at altitude, T increased at 2050 m (from 5.2 ± 2.6 to 8.3 ± 2.7 ng mL −1 , P < 0.001) but not at 3000 m. IGF‐1 was elevated (by 16%, P = 0.003, and 11%, P = 0.01 at 2050 and 3000 m, respectively) only after returning to near sea‐level. P‐III‐NP decreased by 20% ( P = 0.01) at 2050 m but increased by 25% ( P < 0.001) at 3000 m. After altitude, Hbmass increased by 3.7% (+40 g, P < 0.001) at 2050 m, and by 3.5% (+34 g, P < 0.001) at 3000 m. Conversely, PV had decreased by 5.7% (−216 mL, P = 0.002) at 2050 m, and by 12.2% (−460 mL, P < 0.001) at 3000 m. In both groups pooled, Hbmass correlated with both T levels ( r = 0.38, P = 0.003) and IGF‐1 values ( r = −0.25, P = 0.04). In conclusion, a higher hypoxic dose at 3000 m ( vs . 2050 m) did not result in a larger relative increase in Hbmass. Steroidal and endocrine variations were observed during the altitude sojourn with differences depending on the altitude level. The amplitude of haematological and training adaptations may be linked to changes in T and IGF‐1 after 3 weeks at 2050 m. image Key points Altitude training camps are widely used by athletes to increase their haemoglobin mass towards enhanced sea‐level performance, while haematological responses are very individual, depending on the hypoxic dose (how high and for how long); steroidal and endocrine responses during altitude training camps have not been investigated to date. This study investigated endocrine and steroidal blood markers in 31 male elite cyclists before, during and after 21 days at 2050 or 3000 m. Steroidal and endocrine variations were observed during the altitude camps with differences depending on the altitude level. The amplitude of haematological and training adaptations may be linked to changes in testosterone and insulin‐like growth factor‐1 after 3 weeks at 2050 m, but further research is required to infer causal relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicHigh Altitude and HypoxiaFrench-language works237,207