Health disturbances stemming from overcrowding and inadequate housing among indigenous peoples within Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indigenous Peoples in Canada have experienced cumulative historical trauma and various current stressors continue to undermine health. Living conditions on First Nations reserves and in Inuit regions have been a constant threat to well-being. In this respect, a significant number of houses are in disrepair and ventilation is poor, allowing for the growth of mold and mycotoxins that favor the development of various respiratory illnesses as well as disturbances related to immune dysfunction that increase vulnerability to bacterial and viral infections. This is compounded by overcrowded conditions, which often entail multiple generations residing within a single home. This can take a toll on psychological and physical health, and increases the risk of transmission of illness among occupants of the same household. The distress created, together with unhealthy diets and lack of potable water, can disturb the abundance of certain microbiota within the gut and on the skin, which can independently have diverse health consequences Supporting these contentions, similar poor living conditions also occur frequently among Indigenous Peoples within other countries (e.g., Australia) and the health consequences are equally pronounced. The distress experienced in earlier generations, operating through disruptions of parental caretaking skills or epigenetic changes may have health consequences on ensuing generations, and are exacerbated by exposure to ongoing chronic stressors, including poverty, overcrowding within homes, and inadequate housing conditions. Despite repeated calls to remedy the housing crisis experienced by Indigenous Peoples in Canada, improvements have been slow in materializing and the situation has remained dire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".