MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417330414 · doi:10.25368/2025.380

Para Badminton : Planungsgrundlagen für eine Mehrzwecksporthalle

2025· book-chapter· W4417330414 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSports Science and Education
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Quarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In den letzten Jahren hat sich das Para Badminton auf internationaler Ebene, insbesondere durch die Paralympics 2020 in Tokio, zunehmend im Leistungssport etabliert. In Sachsen ist das Para Badminton im Vereins- und Breitensport nur geringfügig verankert. Für die vermehrte Etablierung des Sports müssen zunächst grundlegende Voraussetzungen geschaffen werden. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es herauszufinden welche Anforderungen das Para Badminton an die Gestaltung von Mehrzwecksporthallen stellt. [... aus dem Text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSports Science and EducationFrench-language works237,207