Plain sexism or misogyny? gender discrimination, sexual harassment, and a non-consensual kiss
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 2019 FIFA Women’s World Cup in France was crowned with success in every aspect of the competition, with the United States Women’s National Team (USWNT) winning their fourth World Cup title. The mere fact that the world champions, however, would soon after file a gender discrimination lawsuit against their very own football federation only serves to emphasize the degree of inequality that continues to blemish modern-day professional football. The male-dominated game of football seems to persistently resist any notion of gender equality, much like gender discrimination in any other part of society, as women’s football is, still, tarnished by wage inequality and voices of sexual harassment. Against this background, this study discusses the legal dispute between the USWNT and U.S. Soccer, cases of sexual harassment in the United States and Canada, and the infamous Luis Rubiales kiss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it