Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans un livre inédit portant sur la pensée de Rousseau, Marc Richir entame une réflexion sur la question de la pitié. Pour y parvenir, il s’inspire notamment des lectures de Jacques Derrida, qu’il entend radicaliser. Dans un premier temps, nous aimerions revenir sur le statut phénoménologique de la réflexion au sein de la pitié afin de mettre en évidence une sorte de réflexivité précédant la réflexion. Dans un second temps, nous aimerions montrer que cette réflexivité permet de penser un « double-mouvement de la phénoménalisation » qui, de façon an-archique et a-téléologique, travaille la question du social et du politique. Enfin, nous aimerions montrer que ce double-mouvement impose un double déplacement : eu égard à la question de l’intersubjectivité, mais aussi et surtout concernant la division sociale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it